View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research HEART Framework | ![]() Delivery RAID Log | ![]() Architecture Views and Beyond | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-3 Tage | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 1-4 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Architecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |



