methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration for Ideal Days.
Agile
Ideal Days
Paper illustration for Story Points.
Agile
Story Points
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When effort needs to be thought of as real working time, it offers a simple common denominator for comparison. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Ideal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, and Capacity Caveats.When teams want to rate complexity rather than hours, it creates a shared, relative scale. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as Point Estimates, Reference Stories, and Velocity Data.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumMedium
Timedifferent
120 min initial, dann laufend15-60 minlaufend, 1-5 min je Item90-180 min
Participantsdifferent
3-62-93-93-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
HEART-GSM Table, DashboardIdeal Day Estimates, Assumption Notes, Capacity CaveatsPoint Estimates, Reference Stories, Velocity DataGQM Table, Metric Profiles
Tagsno overlap
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
EstimationEffortAgile
EstimationAgileMeasurement
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
Add more methods