methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration for Alignment Mapping.
Facilitation
Alignment Mapping
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
120 min initial, dann laufend90-180 min1-4 Wochen1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
3-63-66-30 Experten4-12
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
HEART-GSM Table, DashboardGQM Table, Metric ProfilesExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesAlignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions
Tagsno overlap
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation
Add more methods