View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Product Strategy GIST Planning |  Business Strategy Balanced Scorecard |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. | Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures. | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 120 min initial, dann laufend | Wochen bis Monate je Goal | Halber Tag bis mehrere Wochen | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 3-10 | 4-12 | 2-8 |
Formatsame | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports | Balanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative Map | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments | StrategyMetricsExecution | StrategyAnalysisPlanning |