methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper scorecard with four perspectives, connected objective cards and columns for measures, targets and initiatives.
Business Strategy
Balanced Scorecard
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.Balanced Scorecard translates strategy into a few interconnected perspectives and metrics. It holds impact, steering, and learning together in daily work instead of narrowing strategy down to financial figures.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighHigh
Timedifferent
120 min initial, dann laufend1-3 hHalber Tag bis mehrere Wochen1-4 Wochen
Participantsdifferent
3-61-54-121-6
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
HEART-GSM Table, DashboardFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesBalanced Scorecard, Strategic Measures, Initiative MapExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summary
Tagsno overlap
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
StrategyMetricsExecution
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
Add more methods