View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research HEART Framework | ![]() UX Research Empathy Mapping | ![]() UX Research Diary Study |
|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | When a lot is assumed about a target group but little is seen jointly, empathy mapping makes knowledge and gaps directly comparable. The picture also shows which assumptions hold up and where evidence is missing. | When experiences build up over days or weeks and a single session cannot capture them, Diary Study records the course of everyday life. Recurring triggers, moods, and habits become visible this way, beyond the sharpness of memory. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 30–60 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-8 | 5-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Empathy Map, Assumptions List, Research Gaps | Diary Entries, Longitudinal Patterns, Experience Timeline |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | SynthesisQualitativeWorkshop | UX researchTrackingBehavior |
Often compared together
Methods with strong topical overlap with the current selection, not yet in the comparison.






