View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  UX Research HEART Framework |  Product Strategy DIBB |  Engineering Goal Question Metric |  Decision Making Assumption Surfacing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report. | Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs. | Plans often contain assumptions that were never openly stated and remain dangerous precisely because of that. Assumption Surfacing makes these silent premises visible and prioritizes which of them carry the initiative or could sink it. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 1-2 h | 90-180 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 2-8 | 3-6 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | DIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report | GQM Table, Metric Profiles | Assumption List, Critical Assumptions, Learning Plan |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis | MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment | AssumptionsRiskDecisionDiscovery |