View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() UX Research HEART Framework | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Product Discovery Assumption Mapping | ![]() Decision Making DACI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 120 min initial, dann laufend | 90-180 min | 45-60 min | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-6 | 4-12 | 2-8 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | HEART-GSM Table, Dashboard | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Assumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment |



