methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Purposedifferent
Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumMedium
Timedifferent
120 min initial, dann laufend1-4 Wochen1-3 h45-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-61-61-52-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
HEART-GSM Table, DashboardExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryFunnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking
Tagsno overlap
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
Add more methods