Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Selected:Goal Question Metric Architecture Decision Record ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)arc42

Criterion	Engineering Goal Question Metric	Architecture Architecture Decision Record	Architecture ARID (Active Reviews for Intermediate Designs)	Architecture arc42
Purposedifferent	Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.	An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.	ARID examines how well developers can work with a technical design. It focuses on a part of the system that can still be revised, between the architecture overview and the detailed specification.	arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.
Complexitydifferent	Medium	Low	Medium	Low
Timedifferent	90-180 min	15-45 min	2–4 h review as a planning range; preparation and evaluation additional	1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent	3-6	1-3	Designers, developers as users, and facilitation	1-4
Formatdifferent	Workshop	Async	Workshop + async	Workshop + async
Outputdifferent	GQM Table, Metric Profiles	ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale	Prioritized development tasks, Jointly produced code or pseudocode, Observed difficulties and open design questions, Proposed design revisions	Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View
Tagsno overlap	MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment	ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance	ArchitectureEngineeringFeedbackValidationTasks	ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication

Add more methods