methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
Purposedifferent
GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.
Complexitydifferent
MediumHighMediumHigh
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate je GoalHalf day45-90 min2-4 h
Participantsdifferent
3-103-123-83-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsLeverage Map, Action StrategyImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsFuture Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections
Tagsno overlap
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
Add more methods