methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration for Fault Isolation.
Engineering
Fault Isolation
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.In technical failures, the visible symptom often gets mixed up with the actual cause. Fault Isolation narrows the fault space and progressively reduces which part of the system is truly affected.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate je Goal30-180 min30-120 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
3-101-62-61
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsFault Isolation Map, Test Log, Excluded Hypotheses, Narrowed Fault AreaObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
TroubleshootingDiagnosisEngineering
LeanObservationProcessOperations
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods