methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of GIST Planning with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
GIST Planning
Paper illustration for Evaporating Cloud.
Systems Thinking
Evaporating Cloud
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration of a calm four-quadrant Assumption Map with hypothesis cards and emphasis on important assumptions with little evidence.
Product Discovery
Assumption Mapping
Purposedifferent
GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list.The method makes visible why two seemingly incompatible demands arise and which assumption must be tested to resolve the conflict.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.When assumptions still sit unordered in the room, it weighs uncertainty against leverage. It makes visible which hypotheses should be checked first.
Complexitysame
MediumMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
Wochen bis Monate je Goal60-120 min45-90 min45-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-102-83-82-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reportsConflict Cloud, Assumption List, Breakthrough Ideas, Next ExperimentsImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsAssumption map, Test backlog, Risk ranking
Tagsno overlap
RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments
Theory of ConstraintsAssumptionsSystems thinking
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
AssumptionsRiskExperimentsValidation
Add more methods