View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Product Strategy GIST Planning | ![]() Architecture arc42 | ![]() Product Discovery Opportunity Solution Tree | ![]() Architecture Architecture Decision Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. | arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes. | When discovery keeps swinging between goals, ideas, and learning loops, it creates clear steering logic. It connects the desired outcome, opportunities, and experiments into a legible structure. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | Wochen bis Monate je Goal | 1-2 Tage | 1-2 h Setup, laufend | 15-45 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 1-4 | 2-6 | 1-3 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports | Architecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View | Opportunity Solution Tree, Experiment Backlog, Learning Log | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale |
Tagsno overlap | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments | ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication | DiscoveryOutcomesExperimentsOpportunity | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance |



