methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration of Rolestorming with its method-specific working model.
Innovation
Rolestorming
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration for Reverse Brainstorming
Innovation
Reverse Brainstorming
Purposedifferent
When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When a search for ideas stalls, switching roles helps people step outside their own perspective and activate new logics of action. The method reduces habit because contributions arise from a different stance. This brings unfamiliar, often fitting solution approaches into play.When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster.For persistent errors or blockages, the method shifts the view to the opposite of the desired effect. It exposes the mechanics of failure and makes hidden causes easier to grasp. This makes improvement more concrete and the problem clearer.
Complexitysame
LowLowLowLow
Timedifferent
30-120 min30-60 min10-20 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
2-63-124-100+3-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Observation Notes, Improvement IdeasRollenkarten, Ideenpool pro Rolle, Konsolidierte ShortlistIdea List, Shared Insights, Emergent ThemesReverse Ideas, Risk Themes, Solution Ideas
Tagsno overlap
LeanObservationProcessOperations
BrainstormingIdeationCreativity
FacilitationInclusionIdeation
BrainstormingIdeationCreativityRisk
Add more methods