methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration of Goal Question Metric with its method-specific working model.
Engineering
Goal Question Metric
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of HEART Framework with its method-specific working model.
UX Research
HEART Framework
Purposedifferent
When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.Helps clarify technical problems, hypotheses, and next steps in concrete terms. It breaks a technical problem into testable parts. The result is captured as a GQM table and metric briefs.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.Helps clarify observations, needs, and patterns in concrete terms. It groups observations into patterns, questions, and decisions. The result is captured as a HEART-GSM table and dashboard.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumMedium
Timedifferent
30-120 min90-180 min45-90 min120 min initial, dann laufend
Participantsdifferent
2-63-62-53-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Observation Notes, Improvement IdeasGQM Table, Metric ProfilesA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisHEART-GSM Table, Dashboard
Tagsno overlap
LeanObservationProcessOperations
MetricsMeasurementEngineeringAlignment
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
MetricsUX researchMeasurementSatisfaction
Add more methods