methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
Paper illustration for OODA Loop.
Decision Making
OODA Loop
Purposedifferent
When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia.
Complexitydifferent
LowLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
30-120 min45-90 min60-90 min15-60 min je Zyklus
Participantsdifferent
2-63-124-101-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Observation Notes, Improvement IdeasForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentSituation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates
Tagsno overlap
LeanObservationProcessOperations
ChangeDecisionStrategy
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
DecisionChangeLearningStrategy
Add more methods