View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Operations Gemba Walk |  Agile Example Mapping |  Operations After-Action Review |  Agile Specification by Example |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions. | When a story carries business rules and exceptions, it brings clarity before implementation. It makes examples, open questions, and boundaries visible enough that the logic becomes jointly sound. | After missions or project phases with unclear outcomes, the method makes visible what actually happened and what can be learned from it. It separates course, effect, and causes so experience turns into solid improvement. | When business rules need to become precise, it ties language, example, and test together. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as an Example Table and Acceptance Tests. |
Complexitydifferent | Low | Low | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 30-120 min | 30-60 min | 20-45 min | 60-90 min pro Feature |
Participantsdifferent | 2-6 | 3-7 | 3-12 | 3-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Observation Notes, Improvement Ideas | Example Map, Acceptance Criteria, Open Questions | Lessons learned, Action items, Event summary | Example Table, Acceptance Tests |
Tagsno overlap | LeanObservationProcessOperations | Behavior-Driven DevelopmentRequirementsExamplesRefinement | LearningOperationsImprovement | AgileRequirementsExamplesBehavior-Driven Development |