methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration for Cynefin Workshop.
Decision Making
Cynefin Workshop
Paper illustration of DIBB with its method-specific working model.
Product Strategy
DIBB
Purposedifferent
When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.When problems are unclear, chaotic, or only seemingly familiar, standard recipes fall short. A Cynefin Workshop sorts situations by the nature of their problem and connects them with matching action logic.DIBB helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities by making the logic behind a decision explicit. It captures results as a DIBB document, belief list, bet list, and learning report.
Complexitydifferent
LowHighMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-120 min1-4 Wochen60-180 min1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-66-30 Experten4-202-8
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Observation Notes, Improvement IdeasExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesCynefin Map, Domain-specific Actions, Sensemaking NotesDIBB document, Belief list, Bet list, Learning report
Tagsno overlap
LeanObservationProcessOperations
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
ComplexitySensemakingDecision
StrategyDecisionAssumptionsHypothesis
Add more methods