methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Paper illustration of Decision Rights Mapping with its method-specific working model.
Decision Making
Decision Rights Mapping
Paper illustration of an IBIS map with issues, positions and arguments
Knowledge Modeling
IBIS
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement.IBIS structures thinking about complex questions as a sequence of issues, ideas, and arguments. The method keeps discussions open without forcing them into premature consensus.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-120 min90-180 min1-3 h15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
2-64-122-81-3
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsync
Outputdifferent
Observation Notes, Improvement IdeasDecision Rights Matrix, AgreementIssue Map, Positions, Argument NotesADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
LeanObservationProcessOperations
DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility
RationaleKnowledgeDecision
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods