methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of a branching impact map with a Why goal at the root, actor circles, How behavior changes and What options.
Product Strategy
Impact Mapping
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
LowMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
30-120 min45-90 min45-90 min10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
2-62-53-81
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Observation Notes, Improvement IdeasA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisImpact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery OptionsDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
LeanObservationProcessOperations
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods