View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Product Discovery Pretotyping |  Product Strategy Impact Mapping |  Product Discovery Fake Door Test |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | Pretotyping clarifies whether a customer problem and solution idea create enough real demand. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence, and captures the result as a pretotyping sketch, test setup, and conversion data. | When a goal needs to be connected to several possible paths, it shows chains of impact instead of feature lists. It connects business goal, behavior change, and measures. | When demand is still unclear, it measures interest in a feature before it is built. It separates real behavior from polite agreement and deliberately keeps build effort small. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | Stunden bis wenige Tage | 45-90 min | 1-5 Tage |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 1-4 | 3-8 | Nutzertraffic |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Pretotyping sketch, Test setup, Conversion data, Go or no-go decision | Impact Map, Outcome Hypotheses, Delivery Options | Click Data, Interest Signal, Learning Decision |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | ValidationDemandMVP | OutcomesStrategyBehaviorPlanning | ValidationExperimentsDemandDiscovery |