View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Facilitation Dot Voting |  Product Strategy GIST Planning |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. | GIST Planning helps clarify target groups, value, goals, and priorities. It links customer value, product logic, and decision priorities, and captures the result as goals, an idea bank, and a step-project list. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 5-15 min | Wochen bis Monate je Goal | 60-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-20 | 3-10 | 5-12 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist | Goals, Idea bank, Step-project list, Tasks, Learning reports | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization | RoadmapOutcomesPlanningExperiments | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion |