View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Business Strategy GAP Analysis | ![]() Knowledge Modeling Domain Storytelling | ![]() Business Strategy Scenario Planning | ![]() Domain Modeling Context Map |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | Domain Storytelling translates domain knowledge into a shared narrative of actors, objects, and workflows. It is especially useful when language, rules, and process understanding must be tightly connected. | Scenario Planning opens the view to several plausible futures instead of a single forecast. The method protects strategies from depending on too narrow an expected path. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-2 h | 0.5-2 Tage | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 2-8 | 4-12 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Domain Story, Glossary Notes, Process Narrative | Scenario Set, Strategic Implications, Robust Options | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | KnowledgeDomain-Driven DesignProcess | StrategyUncertaintyPlanning | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy |



