methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Decision Tree method illustration showing its working structure
Decision Making
Decision Tree
Anonymous individual judgments pass through feedback loops to form a distribution.
Decision Making
Delphi Method
Paper illustration for TOWS Matrix.
Business Strategy
TOWS Matrix
Purposedifferent
GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.For decisions with follow-on paths and dependencies, a linear comparison is often not enough. A Decision Tree shows how options branch under conditions and which consequences hang on each branch.When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together.The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h30-90 min1-4 Wochen1-2 h
Participantsdifferent
2-81-66-30 Experten3-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesDecision Tree, Option Map, Assumption ListExpert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption NotesTOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority Actions
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
DecisionTreeOptions
ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy
StrategyAnalysisOptions
Add more methods