methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Paper illustration for Decision Framing Workshop.
Decision Making
Decision Framing Workshop
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Paper illustration for Option Framing.
Decision Making
Option Framing
Purposedifferent
GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.When a decision is poorly framed, even good answers deliver little value. A Decision Framing Workshop sharpens the problem, goal, and boundaries before the actual weighing begins.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.In early decisions, alternatives are often still vague, incomplete, or blended together. Option Framing brings every possibility into a comparable form and makes visible which variant actually fits the question.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h60-120 min10-20 min daily45-120 min
Participantsdifferent
2-84-1013-8
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesDecision Frame, Decision Question, Criteria List, Evidence PlanDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesOption Frames, Assumption Notes, Comparable Shortlist, Decision Inputs
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
Decision framingAlignmentCriteriaOptions
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
OptionsDecision framingStrategyComparison
Add more methods