View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Business Strategy GAP Analysis |  Domain Modeling Bounded Context Canvas |  Systems Thinking Current Reality Tree |  Domain Modeling Context Map |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing. | When a business context is still loosely outlined, it shapes language, responsibility, and integration space. It clarifies what belongs together and where a boundary needs to hold. | A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once. | When several contexts need to talk to each other, it makes their relationships and dependencies legible. It helps sort integration pressure and responsibilities across system boundaries. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-3 h | 2-6 h | 1-3 h |
Participantsdifferent | 2-8 | 3-8 | 3-8 | 2-8 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk Notes | Context Canvas, Glossary, Integration Notes | Current Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention Ideas | Context Map, Integration Patterns, Boundary Notes |
Tagsno overlap | StrategyAnalysisPlanning | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesModeling | Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality | Domain-Driven DesignBoundariesStrategy |