methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Paper illustration for TOWS Matrix.
Business Strategy
TOWS Matrix
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Purposedifferent
GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.The TOWS Matrix connects internal strengths and weaknesses with external opportunities and threats into action-oriented strategies. It goes a step further than a pure stocktaking.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h1-2 Tage1-2 h15-45 min
Participantsdifferent
2-81-43-101-3
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment ViewTOWS Matrix, Strategic Options, Priority ActionsADR File, Decision Log, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
StrategyAnalysisOptions
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
Add more methods