methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Paper illustration for Communication Plan
Delivery
Communication Plan
Views and Beyond method illustration showing its working structure
Architecture
Views and Beyond
Purposedifferent
GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When many people need to be informed in parallel and messages would otherwise arrive unevenly or too late, a Communication Plan orders communication reliably. Channels, audiences, and cadences interlock so important information doesn't get lost.Views and Beyond organizes architecture into several views so no single diagram has to do everything at once. This makes it possible to choose the representation that fits the stakeholder's question.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowLowMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h15-45 min45-90 min1-3 Tage
Participantsdifferent
2-81-32-61-4
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesADR File, Decision Log, RationaleCommunication Plan, Channel Matrix, Message CadenceArchitecture Views, Cross-view Notes, Rationale
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
CommunicationStakeholdersDeliveryPlanning
DocumentationStakeholdersArchitecture
Add more methods