methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Gap Analysis method illustration showing its working structure
Business Strategy
GAP Analysis
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of Leverage Points with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Leverage Points
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
Purposedifferent
GAP Analysis compares the current state with a target picture and makes the distance manageable. It becomes useful when, ahead of new initiatives, it must become clear which capabilities, processes, or resources are missing.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.Leverage Points show exactly where interventions in a system produce a disproportionate effect. It draws relationships, patterns, and feedback loops. The result is captured as a leverage map and action strategy.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumHighLow
Timedifferent
1-3 h45-90 minHalf day10-20 min daily
Participantsdifferent
2-82-53-121
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Gap Matrix, Action Plan, Risk NotesA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisLeverage Map, Action StrategyDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes
Tagsno overlap
StrategyAnalysisPlanning
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
Systems thinkingChangeStrategy
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Add more methods