View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() DevOps Game Day | ![]() Operations Family Tree Analysis | ![]() Operations ALPEN Method | ![]() Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic. | For a series of incidents with a similar pattern, the method arranges individual events as branches of a common origin. It makes visible which conditions keep recurring. | With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag | 2-4 h | 10-20 min daily | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 2-6 | 1 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks | Family Tree Diagram, Pattern Notes, Systemic Measures | Daily Plan, Time Estimates, Review Notes | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | ResilienceOperationsIncident | Root causePatternsIncidentSystemic | PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |



