methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration for Current Reality Tree
Systems Thinking
Current Reality Tree
Paper illustration for ALPEN Method
Operations
ALPEN Method
A 5 Whys working surface connects an observable problem with evidenced causes, marked uncertainty and concrete countermeasures with ownership.
Operations
5 Whys
Purposedifferent
In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.A Current Reality Tree condenses many symptoms into a few causal chains. The method makes visible which core problems drive several negative effects at once.With an overloaded day full of too many tasks, a realistic picture of the day emerges. The method connects estimating, deciding, and buffer thinking so planning fits available energy and time.For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description.
Complexitydifferent
HighHighLowLow
Timedifferent
Halber Tag2-6 h10-20 min daily15-30 min
Participantsdifferent
5-203-812-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksCurrent Reality Tree, Core Problems, Intervention IdeasDaily Plan, Time Estimates, Review NotesRoot cause notes, Countermeasures
Tagsno overlap
ResilienceOperationsIncident
Systems thinkingRoot causeConstraintsCausality
PlanningTime managementProductivityOperations
Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving
Add more methods