methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
A paper-based illustration representing arc42 with its core stages and visible working result.
Architecture
arc42
Purposedifferent
In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.arc42 structures architecture knowledge so teams can document system, decisions, and risks consistently. The template builds a living understanding of the architecture instead of scattered notes.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Halber Tag15-45 min30-120 min1-2 Tage
Participantsdifferent
5-201-32-61-4
Formatdifferent
WorkshopAsyncWorkshopWorkshop + async
Outputdifferent
Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksADR File, Decision Log, RationaleObservation Notes, Improvement IdeasArchitecture Document, Context View, Runtime View, Deployment View
Tagsno overlap
ResilienceOperationsIncident
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
LeanObservationProcessOperations
ArchitectureDocumentationCommunication
Add more methods