methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
Paper illustration for Accountability Ladder
Operations
Accountability Ladder
Paper illustration for Responsibility Poker.
Facilitation
Responsibility Poker
Paper illustration for Delegation Poker.
Facilitation
Delegation Poker
Purposedifferent
In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.With defensive reactions to problems, the method shifts the view from justification to ownership. It makes visible which reaction stage a person or team is currently stuck on.When it stays unclear who carries responsibility and who only contributes, Responsibility Poker makes the distribution of responsibility explicit. It sharpens the boundaries between weighing in, deciding, and bearing consequences.When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
Halber Tag20-45 min45-90 min45-90 min
Participantsdifferent
5-201-83-103-10
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksOwnership Reflection, Action Commitment, Coaching NotesResponsibility Map, Role Agreements, Open QuestionsDelegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements
Tagsno overlap
ResilienceOperationsIncident
ResponsibilityLeadershipTeam
RolesResponsibilityTeamFacilitation
AutonomyRolesTeam
Add more methods