View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  DevOps Game Day |  Operations A3 Problem Solving |  Product Discovery Experiment Canvas |  Operations 5 Whys |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic. | For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together. | When experiments become unreadable after the fact, it arranges hypothesis, signal, and learning goal on a single canvas. It separates problem, assumption, solution, and evidence. The result is captured as a Completed Experiment Canvas and a Success Metric. | For a single, hard-to-explain deviation, the method exposes the causal chain behind the visible symptom. It keeps the cause open until a controllable condition emerges instead of a mere description. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Low |
Timedifferent | Halber Tag | 45-90 min | 30-60 min | 15-30 min |
Participantsdifferent | 5-20 | 2-5 | 1-5 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated Runbooks | A3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause Analysis | Completed Experiment Canvas, Success Metric | Root cause notes, Countermeasures |
Tagsno overlap | ResilienceOperationsIncident | LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations | ExperimentsValidationDiscoveryHypothesis | Root causeIncidentLeanProblem solving |