methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Game Day workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Game Day
A3 Problem-Solving workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
A3 Problem Solving
Paper illustration of two considered options leading to a decision record with a marked status and visible consequences.
Architecture
Architecture Decision Record
Gemba Walk workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Operations
Gemba Walk
Purposedifferent
In preparing for rare incidents, the method tests response capability under controlled conditions. It shows where assumptions about stability, roles, and recovery are too optimistic.For a complex deviation with several people involved, the method bundles problem, analysis, and decision onto one page. It creates a shared working space where causes, countermeasures, and follow-up fit together.An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable.When there is uncertainty about the real course of a process, the method brings observation to the place where work happens. It combines perception, follow-up questions, and process knowledge so decisions rest on actual workflows instead of assumptions.
Complexitydifferent
HighMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
Halber Tag45-90 min15-45 min30-120 min
Participantsdifferent
5-202-51-32-6
Formatdifferent
WorkshopWorkshop + asyncAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Simulation Notes, Gaps List, Updated RunbooksA3 Report, Action Plan, Root Cause AnalysisADR File, Decision Log, RationaleObservation Notes, Improvement Ideas
Tagsno overlap
ResilienceOperationsIncident
LeanProblem solvingCoachingOperations
ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance
LeanObservationProcessOperations
Add more methods