View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Futures Wheel |  Facilitation Nominal Group Technique |  Systems Thinking CATWOE Analysis |  Facilitation Dot Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event. | When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting. | CATWOE structures a problem from six viewpoints and prevents too narrow a view of the situation. Different experiences of the system become comparably discussable this way. | When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 60-120 min | 60-120 min | 45-90 min | 5-15 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-10 | 5-12 | 3-8 | 3-20 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop + async | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals | Ranked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group Priority | CATWOE Canvas, Root Definition, Stakeholder Perspectives, Constraints | Ranked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist |
Tagsno overlap | ForesightSystems thinkingSignals | FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion | Systems thinkingFramingStakeholders | FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization |