methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Futures Wheel with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Futures Wheel
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration for 1-2-4-All.
Facilitation
1-2-4-All
Paper illustration for ABC Analysis
Operations
ABC Analysis
Purposedifferent
The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When many people in a group too rarely get to speak, 1-2-4-All distributes thinking time more fairly. The format builds participation step by step and makes quiet or still-unformed thoughts usable faster.With many similar objects of differing economic significance, the method prioritizes effort by effect. It separates what needs regular steering from what rarely needs attention.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumLowLow
Timedifferent
60-120 min60-120 min10-20 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-105-124-100+1-5
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshopAsync
Outputdifferent
Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic SignalsRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityIdea List, Shared Insights, Emergent ThemesABC Classification, Focus Rules, Control List
Tagsno overlap
ForesightSystems thinkingSignals
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
FacilitationInclusionIdeation
PrioritizationOperationsPortfolio
Add more methods