methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration of Futures Wheel with its method-specific working model.
Systems Thinking
Futures Wheel
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Incident Command workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
DevOps
Incident Command
Paper illustration for Mad Sad Glad
Agile
Mad Sad Glad
Purposedifferent
The Futures Wheel helps explore the consequences of a decision, a trend, or a strategic move in a structured way. It makes visible which first, second, and third-order effects could arise from an event.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.During an acute incident with several people involved, the method creates a clear leadership and communication structure. It reduces chaos when fast coordination and clean situational awareness are both needed at once.When a team's or workshop's mood needs to become readable, it structures emotional signals with little setup. It makes strain, relief, and sources of energy tangible.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowMediumLow
Timedifferent
60-120 min45–75 minAs needed30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-10Team members involved4-153-10
Formatdifferent
Workshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop + asyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Futures Wheel, Consequence Chains, Strategic Signals4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsIncident Log, Action Tracker, Stakeholder UpdatesEmotion Board, Themes, Action Items
Tagsno overlap
ForesightSystems thinkingSignals
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
IncidentOperationsReliability
RetrospectiveTeamReflection
Add more methods