View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Delivery RAID Log |  Systems Thinking Intervention Mapping |  Agile ROAM Board |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | Helps clarify scope, sequence, and delivery flow in concrete terms. It makes work, boundaries, and order steerable. The result is captured as a RAID Log and a source for status reporting. | Intervention Mapping translates a need for change into a planned, evaluable program. The method connects target group, determinants, actions, and measurement into a traceable chain. | When work needs to move between different states or columns, it makes that movement and its handoffs legible. It sorts work by value, risk, and delivery ability. The result is captured as a ROAM Board and an Owner List. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | High | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30 min Setup, dann laufend | 1-5 Tage | 20-40 min initial, dann laufend |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-3 maintaining, briefing for everyone | 4-12 | 3-15 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | RAID Log, Status Report Source | Logic Model, Change Objectives, Intervention Components, Evaluation Plan | ROAM Board, Owner List |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | RiskTrackingStakeholdersGovernance | ChangeSystems thinkingCapability | RiskAgileTrackingAlignment |