View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Knowledge Modeling Ontology Design Patterns |  Systems Thinking Iceberg Model |  Knowledge Modeling NeOn Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | Ontology Design Patterns provide reusable building blocks for recurring modeling problems. The method brings structure to the search for clean concepts, relationships, and roles. | The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring. | The NeOn Methodology structures ontology work as a controlled process with reuse, scenarios, and reviews. It is useful when ontologies should not emerge ad hoc but modularly and reusably. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 1-3 h pro Pattern | 30-60 min | Mehrere Wochen bis Monate |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 1-6 | 2-10 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Selected Patterns, Adapted Schema Fragments, Pattern Documentation | Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas | Ontology Requirements Specification, Reuse Plan, Ontology Modules, Evaluation Report |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | OntologyPatternsReuseSemanticModeling | Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns | OntologyMethodologyReuseSemanticEngineering |