View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Systems Thinking Iceberg Model |  Knowledge Modeling Competency Questions |  Operations Change Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | The Iceberg Model separates visible events from patterns, structures, and mental models. This turns a single observation into a deeper understanding of why a problem keeps recurring. | Competency Questions translate a domain model into concrete questions that it must be able to answer. The method keeps the model's scope clean and prevents pretty but useless structures. | For a deviation after a change, the method isolates the influence of the altered condition. It narrows down which differences are relevant and which are just accompanying noise. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 30-60 min | 2-4 h | 45-120 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 2-10 | 2-8 | 2-6 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Iceberg Worksheet, Pattern Notes, Intervention Ideas | Competency Question Set, Required Concepts, Test Queries, Coverage Matrix | Change Matrix, Cause Hypotheses, Validation Questions, Action List |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | Systems thinkingRoot causePatterns | OntologyKnowledge graphScopeRequirementsSemantic | ChangeRoot causeTroubleshootingComparison |