View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree |  Facilitation Delegation Poker |  Decision Making OODA Loop |  Decision Making DACI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When decisions get stuck between leadership and team, Delegation Poker clarifies the desired scope of autonomy. It shows how much decision-making latitude a role should actually get in practice. | In dynamic situations, decisions become outdated faster than they can be prepared. The OODA Loop holds observing, orienting, deciding, and acting together as a recurring rhythm so reaction does not slide into inertia. | In cross-functional decisions, responsibilities quickly blur between approval, influence, and execution. DACI arranges these roles so decision pressure, contribution, and information stay cleanly separated. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Low | Medium | Low |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | 45-90 min | 15-60 min je Zyklus | 30-60 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 3-10 | 1-8 | 2-10 |
Formatdifferent | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop + async | Workshop + async |
Outputdifferent | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Delegation Board, Decision Boundaries, Role Agreements | Situation Assessment, Decision Loop, Action Updates | DACI Matrix, Decision Owner, Decision Log |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | AutonomyRolesTeam | DecisionChangeLearningStrategy | DecisionRolesGovernanceAlignment |