View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Systems Thinking Future Reality Tree | ![]() Facilitation Barcamp | ![]() Facilitation Decision Jam | ![]() Facilitation Fishbowl Discussion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation. | When many people can contribute knowledge and the flow should stay open, Barcamp provides a framework for self-organized sessions. The format channels energy without defining the content too narrowly in advance. | When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer. | When a controversial topic needs depth and discipline at the same time, Fishbowl Discussion makes the structure of the conversation transparent. The format keeps the core small enough for real dialogue and open enough for controlled turnover. |
Complexitydifferent | High | Medium | Low | Medium |
Timedifferent | 2-4 h | Halber Tag bis 2 Tage | 60-90 min | 45-90 min |
Participantsdifferent | 3-8 | 15-200 | 4-10 | 8-80 |
Formatsame | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections | Session Board, Session Notes, Community Learnings | Problem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, Experiment | Discussion Insights, Observed Tensions, Follow-up Questions |
Tagsno overlap | Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange | FacilitationLarge groupLearning | FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop | FacilitationDialogueLarge group |



