methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Paper illustration for Future Reality Tree.
Systems Thinking
Future Reality Tree
A structured reflection surfaces what was liked, learned, lacked, and longed for. It is a conversation format and does not validate actions automatically.
Agile
4Ls Retrospective
Paper illustration of the Force Field Analysis working structure.
Decision Making
Force Field Analysis
Paper illustration of a team retrospective with three separate Start, Stop, and Continue areas and a shared action list.
Agile
Start Stop Continue
Purposedifferent
A Future Reality Tree shows how desired actions are meant to lead to a better system state. The method checks whether a path of change holds together logically before time flows into implementation.When a sprint should not only be assessed but also learned from, it captures experience in clear learning categories. It records what worked, what's missing, and what should run differently next time.In change initiatives, supporting and restraining forces sit at the table at the same time. Force Field Analysis makes these tensions explicit and shows where change can be pushed forward by strengthening or relieving.When a team wants to deliberately adjust its working behavior, it makes habits visible and assessable. It focuses on concrete changes instead of diffuse mood.
Complexitydifferent
HighLowLowLow
Timedifferent
2-4 h45–75 min45-90 min30-60 min
Participantsdifferent
3-8Team members involved3-123-12
Formatsame
WorkshopWorkshopWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Future Reality Tree, Negative Branches, Assumption List, Improved Injections4Ls Board, Learning Themes, Improvement ActionsForce Field Map, Change Levers, Risk NotesStart Stop Continue Board, Improvement Actions
Tagsno overlap
Theory of ConstraintsSystems thinkingChange
RetrospectiveLearningReflectionTeam
ChangeDecisionStrategy
RetrospectiveImprovementTeamReflection
Add more methods