View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Architecture Risk Storming |  Facilitation Alignment Mapping |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | Helps clarify architecture context, options, and consequences in concrete terms. It organizes technical context, alternatives, and consequences. The result is captured as an Annotated Diagram, a Prioritized Risk List, and an Action Backlog. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Medium | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 60-90 min | 1-2 h | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 4-12 | 4-12 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Workshop | Async |
Outputdifferent | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Annotated Diagram, Prioritized Risk List, Action Backlog | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | RiskArchitectureWorkshopValidation | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |