methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of Hooked Model with its method-specific working model.
Growth
Hooked Model
Independent contributions form an ordered group priority list.
Facilitation
Nominal Group Technique
Paper illustration of shared options, independently placed voting dots, and a highlighted shortlist.
Facilitation
Dot Voting
Purposedifferent
When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.The Hooked Model helps clarify engagement loops, user behavior, and experiments. It makes repeat behavior measurable and captures the result as a hooked loop, trigger map, and reward design.When loud voices could dominate a round, Nominal Group Technique protects individual thinking time from group effects. It collects ideas separately first and only then enables shared weighting.When a workshop has produced too many options and the group needs to condense quickly, dot voting makes preferences visible in a short time. It bundles individual votes into a solid signal for the next selection.
Complexitydifferent
MediumMediumMediumLow
Timedifferent
1-3 hMultiple workshops over several weeks60-120 min5-15 min
Participantsdifferent
1-52-85-123-20
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshop + asyncWorkshopWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesHooked loop, Trigger map, Reward design, Ethics checkRanked Ideas, Clarified Options, Group PriorityRanked list, Consensus signal, Shortlist
Tagsno overlap
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
GrowthBehaviorRetention
FacilitationPrioritizationVotingInclusion
FacilitationVotingConsensusPrioritization
Add more methods