View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion | ![]() Growth Funnel Analysis | ![]() Decision Making Decision Rights Mapping | ![]() Decision Making Delphi Method | ![]() Facilitation Alignment Mapping |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | In organizations with many stakeholders, it often blurs who actually decides and who is merely consulted. It separates options, evaluation criteria, and open risks. The result is captured as a Decision Rights matrix and an agreement. | When knowledge is distributed and direct dominance should be avoided, groups quickly fall under the sway of their opinion leaders. The Delphi Method gathers assessments iteratively and gradually brings expert judgments closer together. | When several people work toward one goal but hold different mental maps, Alignment Mapping makes the discrepancies visible. It arranges goals, assumptions, and priorities so shared direction becomes verifiable. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Medium | High | Medium |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 90-180 min | 1-4 Wochen | 1-2 h |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 4-12 | 6-30 Experten | 4-12 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop | Async | Workshop |
Outputdifferent | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Decision Rights Matrix, Agreement | Expert Forecast, Consensus Range, Assumption Notes | Alignment Map, Open Issues, Decision Questions |
Tagsno overlap | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | DecisionGovernanceAlignmentResponsibility | ForecastingExpertsDecisionStrategy | AlignmentStakeholdersStrategyFacilitation |



