methodatlas
Compare

View methods side by side.

Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.

Criterion
Funnel Analysis workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
Funnel Analysis
Paper illustration of the Lightning Decision Jam working structure.
Facilitation
Decision Jam
A/B Testing workspace showing the question, observations, and next decision.
Growth
A/B Testing
Paper illustration of the Consensus Workshop working structure.
Facilitation
Consensus Workshop
Purposedifferent
When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses.When a decision is stuck, Decision Jam loosens the knot through structured separation of problem, idea, and selection. The format creates movement without jumping prematurely at the first seemingly elegant answer.When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects.When a group needs a solid decision without outvoting individual factions, a Consensus Workshop creates a negotiable common ground. It makes agreement, reservations, and open tensions discussable at the same time.
Complexitydifferent
MediumLowHighMedium
Timedifferent
1-3 h60-90 min1-4 Wochen1-3 h
Participantsdifferent
1-54-101-65-30
Formatdifferent
AsyncWorkshopAsyncWorkshop
Outputdifferent
Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypothesesProblem Cluster, Prioritized Challenge, ExperimentExperiment results, Decision log, Learning summaryConsensus Clusters, Theme Titles, Priority Areas
Tagsno overlap
AnalyticsConversionGrowth
FacilitationDecisionProblem solvingWorkshop
ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation
FacilitationConsensusWorkshopAlignment
Add more methods