View methods side by side.
Choose up to four methods. Add them using the search and share the comparison by copying its link.
| Criterion |  Growth Funnel Analysis |  Architecture C4 Model |  Architecture Architecture Decision Record |  Growth A/B Testing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Purposedifferent | When many visitors or users drop off along the way, the reason behind the number often stays hidden. Funnel Analysis exposes these transitions and makes visible exactly where the path collapses. | The C4 Model makes a system legible across several resolution levels, from context down to code. It suits situations where different audiences need to understand the same architecture from different altitudes. | An ADR permanently records an architecture decision with context, trade-offs, and consequence. It creates continuity for later changes because the decision path stays traceable. | When two variants compete, discussions quickly decide by taste rather than effect. A/B Testing checks behavior under controlled conditions and separates real improvement from chance or expectation effects. |
Complexitydifferent | Medium | Low | Low | High |
Timedifferent | 1-3 h | 1-4 h | 15-45 min | 1-4 Wochen |
Participantsdifferent | 1-5 | 1-5 | 1-3 | 1-6 |
Formatdifferent | Async | Workshop + async | Async | Async |
Outputdifferent | Funnel report, Drop-off analysis, Optimization hypotheses | Context Diagram, Container Diagram, Component Diagram | ADR File, Decision Log, Rationale | Experiment results, Decision log, Learning summary |
Tagsno overlap | AnalyticsConversionGrowth | ArchitectureCommunicationVisualization | ArchitectureRationaleDocumentationGovernance | ExperimentsGrowthAnalyticsValidation |